

See more
I have more than 18 years of experience in the field of law, before moving to Great Britain I specialized in legal representation, corporate support of enterprises, analysis and drafting of contracts, as well as legal support of commercial activities. She began her career in the public sector, where she gained significant experience in interaction with regulatory bodies and legal regulation. Subsequently, she worked in private companies, engaged in contractual work, legal analysis of documentation, support of court cases and interaction with state institutions. For several years, she headed the legal department of a large utility company, where she organized the team's work, developed legal strategies, represented the company's interests in courts, accompanied inspections and provided legal control of transactions. Thanks to effective work, it was possible to significantly reduce the company's debt, optimize contractual activities and implement effective communication mechanisms between departments. I have experience in supporting public procurement, including analysis of tender documents, appeals against decisions in relevant bodies and work with state audits. She was also involved in the preparation of founding documents, company registration and legal support for corporate changes. My expertise includes detailed analysis of legislative changes and their effective application to protect the interests of clients. Thanks to a strategic approach, knowledge of law and practical experience, I help to avoid legal risks and achieve stability in legal matters.
Input Data: The client filed a lawsuit for the division of property acquired during the marriage. The former husband attempted to evade the lawful distribution by presenting false evidence in court regarding the origin of the disputed property in an effort to prove it was his personal property.
Legal Aspects: Determination of the legal status of property acquired during marriage. Proof of joint acquisition of property by spouses. Refutation of false evidence and identification of its inconsistency with the actual circumstances of the case.
Lawyer’s Actions: A detailed analysis of documents confirming the acquisition of property was conducted. Additional evidence was collected, including financial statements, purchase agreements, and witness testimonies. The falsity of the evidence provided by the defendant was identified and proven. The client’s interests were successfully represented in both the first-instance and appellate courts.
Result: The court recognized the property as joint marital property and ruled in favor of the client, ensuring a fair division. The appellate court upheld the decision, confirming the legality of the client’s claims.
Proof of Joint Acquisition of Property by Spouses
Proving the joint acquisition of property by spouses is crucial in cases of divorce, property division, or inheritance disputes. Key points to consider:
Presumption of Joint Property
According to Article 60 of the Family Code of Ukraine, property acquired during marriage is presumed to be joint marital property unless otherwise stipulated by contract (such as a prenuptial agreement) or by law.
Evidence of Property Acquisition During Marriage
To prove joint acquisition of property, the following evidence is necessary:
- Property documents – purchase agreements, ownership certificates, registry extracts, mortgage agreements, etc.
- Financial documents – bank statements, payment receipts, proof of joint expenses.
Witness testimonies – statements from witnesses confirming joint use and financial contributions.
Income documentation – salary certificates, tax declarations proving the ability to acquire property during marriage.- Joint expenses for property improvement – renovation work, upgrades, which confirm investment by both parties.
Exceptions: Personal Property of One Spouse
Personal property includes:
Property acquired before marriage.
Inherited or gifted property.
Property purchased with personal funds, if proven.
Property acquired during the period of separate living when marital relations were effectively terminated.
Statute of Limitations for Property Division
The statute of limitations for property division in divorce cases is 3 years. The countdown begins not from the date of divorce but from the moment the individual became aware (or could have become aware) that their right to a share of the joint property was violated.
What Services Does a Divorce Lawyer Provide?
- Preparation of a divorce petition.
Drafting and filing a claim for property division.
Court representation.
Legal support during negotiations.
Challenging unlawful actions of the other spouse (hiding assets, document forgery, etc.).
Liability for False Evidence
Providing false evidence in court is a serious offense that may lead to legal consequences.
- Criminal Liability – presenting falsified evidence may be considered document forgery (Article 358 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) or misleading the court (Article 384 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine – false testimony). The penalties include fines, restriction of liberty, or even imprisonment.
Civil Liability – the court may reject falsified evidence and impose legal costs on the party attempting to use them.
How to Challenge False Evidence?
If an opponent in court presents forged documents or false testimony, the following steps can be taken:
- File a motion to verify the evidence – request an expert examination of documents or summon witnesses for questioning.
Present counter-evidence – submit authentic documents or other proof to refute the false claims.
File a police report – report the falsification (document forgery, false testimony).
Appeal the court decision – if the ruling was based on falsified evidence, there are grounds for filing an appeal.
If it is impossible to reach an agreement with the other party regarding property division during a divorce, it is necessary to go to court to defend one’s legal rights.
Experienced lawyer Iryna Sydorova will assist in resolving disputes related to property division, represent, and protect your interests in court.
We strongly recommend seeking qualified legal assistance as soon as possible




